Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Mika Brzezinski's secret link to Hillary Clinton (and why she blindly defends her)

Mika Brzezinski of MSNBC's "Morning Joe" is totally ignoring the FACTS behind a NY Times report detailing her lack of foreign policy experience.

Maybe it is because Hillary worked for Jimmy Carter's 1976 Presidential campaign as a field coordinator in Indiana and how Carter appointed her to the board of directors of the Legal Services Corporation that is behind Mika's bias towards Hillary? We all know how Mika's father was a member of the inept Carter Administration, so she probably met Hillary back then and formed the bond that causes her to defend Hillary so blindly.

All Mika needs to do is focus on the FACTS to see how little experience Hillary received when her husband was in Office:

Hillary did NOT have a security clearance - meaning she did not have access to classified information and could not have an informed opinion on any serious subject.

She did NOT attend National Security Meetings, and did NOT have access to the President's daily intelligence briefing - meaning she was totally clueless about any matter of importance in her husband's Administration.

Hillary did NOT get involved with three major crisis situations of her time as First Lady (Haiti, Somalia, & Rwanda) meaning she has no real basis to claim an real foreign policy experience.

Another situation where Hillary could have involved herself with was another missed opportunity because she was so upset with her husband over his affair with Monica Lewinsky that she wasn't on speaking terms with him when the idea of possibly bombing Afghanistan & Sudan came up among his advisers.

Hillary did NOT read classified documents that were at her disposal as a member of the Armed Services Committee - meaning she made uninformed votes on many serious matters of State. (like the war in Iraq)

Mika is either very dumb or very gullible if she thinks that Heads of State treated meetings with Hillary as they did with her husband or his Administration.

Secretary of State Rice has more foreign policy experience than Hillary did in total. A First Lady on a foreign trip is equal to being seated at the kiddie table for a holiday meal.

Mika is confusing quantity of time with quality of service.

But if that is not enough to discredit the Clinton campaign's myth of Hillary being more qualified than the rest of the contenders, here's some other things to consider:

Hillary couldn't pass the bar exam on her first try. After failing in the D.C. exam she went to Arkansas and passed their bar exam to get her license to practice law. Her initial failure in D.C. and then success in Arkansas played a huge part in her changing her mind and finally marrying Bill Clinton.

Even though she earned the right to practice law in the courtroom, Hillary almost never put her education to use in practical terms. This shows that even when she takes time to gain valid experience, she won't use that experience.

When Bill Clinton stood accused of having an affair with Gennifer Flowers, Hillary believed him when he claimed that he would never do it again. As her husband proved those statements to be a lie over and over again it showed that Hillary is either too stupid to know when someone is lying to her, or she was an equal partner in Bill's deception to the American Public all the way through Monica Lewinsky.

From Hillary's campaign management we can tell that she is either someone without scruples that will lie to cover her dirty tactics - or she is someone who can't control the people under her command. Either way, this disqualifies her as a legitimate candidate.

Hillary's campaign also teaches us that she will take money from anyone, regardless of criminal past or reputation - and only distances herself from these people IF the improper behavior is discovered.

When Hillary tried to force feed a flawed healthcare plan upon America, she showed us how she can't manage a staff of people or achieve successful results - while wasting time and taxpayer dollars without meeting the goal of the task given to her.

It's like when Barak Obama refuted the experience tactic by saying that this current Administration was full of people like Rumsfield & Cheney who had tons of experience... and look where it got us. It's far worse to have someone full of bad experience in charge - than to have someone less experienced, but full of common sense.

If you actually go by the standard Mika is advocating... then Mika has foreign policy experience from the time she & Amy Carter ran down the Israeli Prime Minister with a golf cart!!!

Get a clue Mika - you are the newscast equivalent of "The View" co-host Sherri Shepherd because of how dumb she is.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Denial, or Deception?

I can't tell if the many (almost beyond count) people working either directly or indirectly for the benefit of Hillary's campaign are in denial of their actions, or if they are just trying to deceive people into believing untrue statements/actions being perpetrated to help Hillary win the spot on the Democratic ticket.

People come out of the woodwork to defend the dirty tactics being used by people on the behalf of Hillary. Look at how many people have had to leave the campaign and how many donation dollars returned once people see the way Hillary is running her campaign.

It's laughable at how these people deny any conscious wrongdoing by anyone even remotely involved with Hillary's campaign, while going about doing the exact things they claim others are wrong for doing.

It's totally untrue that Hillary was forced by Obama into waging such a dirty campaign... just as it's totally false that Obama was the first to take the low road by allegedly attacking Hillary unfairly.

It's also a lie that Hillary is getting scrutinized more severely than other Democrats... to the contrary, she is getting special treatment from all of the liberally biased media outlets. (unless you call being endorsed by the Iowa newspaper as being unfairly scrutinized)

It's nowhere near true that Hillary is the best candidate able to change the status quo... mostly because she is the epitome of all that is & has been wrong with partisan politics in D.C.

If Hillary is so certain that Obama's health care plan is so terrible... why won't she at least admit that it is 100% better than the fatally flawed plan she tried to force upon us back when she was gaining all of her "experience" as First Lady? (Obama's 15 million not covered seems way better than her 30 million not covered from the old "Hillarycare", don't you agree?)

But beyond that, the media is not accurately and evenly portraying how Democrats do things the same as Republicans do.

Hillary is praised for airing an ad that has the same intention & methodology as the one that Giuliani is being ridiculed for airing. (same exact snarky & fake attitude behind a political ad disguised as a holiday message)

And the race in both parties is equally chaotic, with no clear front runner... yet only the Republicans get negative comments - while Democrats (three of whom are in a statistical dead heat after the clear front runner lost her almost 30 point lead) are praised as being better than Republicans.

What ever happened to objective and unbiased reporting instead of propaganda getting aired to forward the liberal agenda.

It's beyond time for this underhanded political tactics to be used... because it is the American People who will suffer.

Friday, December 14, 2007

words matter (and offensive behavior has consequences)

It wasn't that long ago that a certain Senator from Virginia lost his bid for re-election mostly because he was caught on video saying something inapropriate. (even though his opponent had been equally guilty of the same behavior, but minus the video evidence as proof)

George Allen's comment that was taken as a racial slur stuck with him even after several apologies...

So why shouldn't Hillary Clinton get judged by the same standard as Allen after a very senior members of her campaign staff committed an offensive act of equal severity - regardless of her face to face apology to the subject of the attack?

Whether she approved of what was said about Barak Obama beforehand (which I totally believe) or if she was totally clueless of what her senior staff was up to (or the even worse possibility or her being powerless to control her people - even if it's tactics enacted by her husband on her behalf) Hillary's campaign deserves to suffer the same fate that George Allen's did.

Unless Democrats have no moral standing and choose to take a totally hypocritical path if it means they win the '08 election. (which I believe will happen, going by a long history of such behavior by the Democrat Party... which they manage to get far too many voters to agree with them to the detriment of our Country)

Regardless of who said/did what - or who was behind such offensive tactics - Hillary Clinton is the one who should be responsible. It's her campaign, and she should have the integrity to run her campaign by that wise & worthy rule of "The Buck Stops Here!"

If she can't (or won't) take full responsibilty for anything that happens as a result of her campaign... then she has proven herself to be totally UN-Presidential - and absolutely unworthy of the Democratic nominee.

Hillary talks alot of how this Administration has damaged the American reputation in the eyes of the world... it's ironic that she is allowing her campaign to be an identical twin of what she is demonizing.

So much for her being the "agent of change", huh?

Show Hillary & her people that she is not what America needs right now... do NOT vote for her in any election she is in!!! Show Hillary that words mean things, and that actions have consequences when you cross the line of acceptable behavior as her people (and she) has on a daily basis.

Why Hillary Clinton doesn't deserve your vote

Recent events that relate to the race for the Democrat candidate for President all point to certain failure for the Clinton political machine, and they have nobody to blame but themselves.

There's no up-side for Hillary because she's damned no matter what she does in terms of damage control.

She either ends up looking like she has no control over her campaign staff, or having the same non-existent credibility that plagues the current Administration.

If anyone believes that the cocaine "slip-up" wasn't approved by either Hillary or Bill, then you're as dumb as the Clintons believe the American Public really are.

But let's suppose that she didn't know what such a high ranking member of her campaign staff was going to do... that totally disqualifies her for being President of the United States. If she can't keep such a simple group in line, then what will happen when a serious crisis happens? So much for her alleged experience and ability to lead "from day 1" if this is how she is allowing her campaign be run.

Hillary & her senior staff (including her hubby, the Ex-President) are waging a "win at all costs" campaign that will stoop to any low level if it means Hillary gets a few more potential votes.

The Clintons and their staff have not only "re-written" the past, they have flat out lied about issues as they try to fool people into believing that Hillary is the right choice for the Democrat ticket.

They try to make us forget that her original health care plan (one she called "universal") left twice as many people without coverage than what she claims Obama's plan might do. (her 30 million uninsured makes Obama's alleged 15 million seem like progress) They also don't want to talk about the shell game scheme as a way to pay for her new "universal" plan.

Recent comments by Hillary about no clue about 9/11 are clearly contradicted by such credible sources as the 9/11 Commission. (check MSNBC's archives for the many failures the Commission place on the doorstep of Hillary's Presidency... which also includes Hillary since she is claiming her tenure as First Lady as part of her immense experience she has over every other Democrat & Republican running)

And why are they making such a fuss over the concept that any candidate wishing to be considered to have a legitimate claim on being the Next President contender be required to have foreign policy experience beforehand?

The way I look at things, only 1 out of the previous (and also the current) 8 or so Presidents had actual foreign policy experience before becoming President. Although many had some military service, I'd say that only George H. W. Bush (who ran the C.I.A.) had the level of foreign policy experience that the Clinton Campaign seems to be referring to as their litmus test. Personally, I don't consider that Bush as having the right qualification for the job. Although I respect almost all of the former Presidents being mentioned, I would have to go all the way back to Eisenhowser for someone I feel had the type of experience in foreign matters that the Clinton Machine wants us to judge the potential recipient of our vote by.

Hillary is either delusional or just stupid if she actually believes that the type of meetings she had while being First Lady are equal to what happened when her husband went somewhere on behalf of the American People. I hate to burst her bubble, but what Condi Rice does is about a thousand times more substantial than Hillary's most significant act while her husband was President. Being the First Lady at some State function is the equilivent of sitting at the "Kiddie Table" for Thanksgiving. (And if something happened where Hillary was privy to issues of the highest importance, then I'd have to say that serious breaches in security occurred on each & every time she put herself in that arena - but I doubt that will ever be discussed seriously)

I'm getting lost in the minute details of the many reasons why Hillary doesn't deserve to be the Democratic candidate in the '08 election, let alone our next President... I'll get back on track by simply listing some of the serious flaws to Hillary Clinton's claim as the person her party should have on the ballot come next fall.

Her campaign staff is plagued with people of little or no scruples who will do/say anything to help Hillary win. They make the Enron boys look like saints by comparrison. They will try to get away with any dirty trick, and then use some lame excuse when one of their dishonest deeds gets the opposite result intended. (Who cares if they apologize when it's obvious they don't mean it)

Hillary has also been caught having many people working to raise funds for her campaign that make John Gotti look like "Honest" Abe Lincoln. And then there's all her huge sums coming from corporations, special interest groups, and people who Democrats like to say are behind many a Republican victory... but their liars/propaganda spreaders (I mean spinmeisters) try to portray her as being the exact opposite of the Nixon-esque villan she is.

Hillary has a record of being very Republican (or at least a "loyal Bushie" like Joe Lieberman is trying to be) since taking office as a Senator for the State of New York. She has even imitated the President in how little time she spends actually performing her duties that the People of New York elected her to do. Look back to see how soon after she took her second oath of office that she basically abandoned her post to be a full time campaigner. (it was about 2 or 3 weeks before she forgot about being a Senator & became a Presidential wannabe) And the few votes she has made were either gross mistakes, or acts of partisan divisiveness resulting in what has been a "do nothing" Congress ever since the Democrats scammed their way into being in control of both houses of Congress.

And since Hillary is claiming her husband's time in Office as hers... let's not forget these reasons to vote for someone else:



Hillary's "success" in the cattle futures market as a rookie
Selling the Lincoln Bedroom to the highest Chinese bidder to fill the Dems pockets

Allowing top secret nuclear information just walk out of Los Alamos

Ruby Ridge

Waco, Tx

1st World Trade Center bombing

Al-Quaeda/O.B.L. rise to power & many terror acts

Vince Foster's "suicide" just prior to him potentially making known how many criminal acts the Clinton's committed.

Hillary's association to Communists while "protesting" Viet Nam war

Hillary failing to pass the D.C. Bar exam after law school

Hillary's inability to know what adulterous acts Bill was up while not being able to know he was still lying to her & the U.S. People (either that or she knew what he was doing & helped cover it up)

How Hillary failed to read classified documents available to her regarding terrorist acts leading up to 9/11 as well as the faulty intel that got us into Iraq. She didn't do what she could have done in her position to help stop the Iraq debacle

Her paranoid delusions about a Conservative Republican "conspiracy" she claims has been after her & her husband for decades

Her total lack of integrity while also having an absolute hypocritical foundation that taints everything she does/says

I'm tired of listing things, even though I could go on & on... I have more than proved my point as to why people should vote for ANYBODY but Hillary Clinton. She is not the "agent of change" that her people want us to believe. She is exactly what is wrong with politics & D.C. that needs to be removed like a cancerous tumor.

If I were voting for a candidate for the Democrat nominee (we all know I'm not since I'm a Libertarian) I would totally vote for Barak Obama because he has integrity that Hillary never had.

Hell, I'd even consider voting for Obama (did I really just type that?) if - after becoming the Democratic nominee that is - he would have the sense to ask Harold Ford, Jr to be his V.P. running mate. That's a ticket that a conservative Libertarian like myself would have no problems crossing over to vote for. I would be proud to have an Obama/Ford Administration even though I'd rather have a Huckabee/Tom Ridge one...

I say we could do alot worse than a Obama/Ford Jr Administration... the worst case scenario is a Hillary Clinton Presidency (regardless of the V.P.) with "Slick Willy" roaming the halls of the White House again!!!

Please people, (those of you on the Left) - don't allow such a tragic thing to happen to our Country... do NOT vote for Hillary in any election she might be on the ballot!!