Liberally Biased Media endorse Dems to forget what the People want

Today on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" notoriously biased journalist from The Washington Post Eugene Robinson endorsed a radical idea that Democrats should forget what the People in America want/don't want regarding Healthcare Reform & just pass whatever plan they want into law - while they still can!

Never mind that the People do not want the fatally flawed plans that the House & Senate have put up for vote... or that the White House version isn't any better - Robinson wants the Democrats to just pass their will into law before the November elections - when the People will most likely show Washington D.C. that they aren't behind the Democrats & their total control of the country anymore... and before an almost certain defeat of Democrats in general removes them from power in at least 1, if not both aspects of Congress.

That is about as Unamerican and partisan as it gets folks!!!

Never mind what the voters want, just force your will upon them & later on demands they say thanks - regardless of how damaging it is to the Country!!!

Robinson has always been liberally biased, as 99.9% of the NBC/Universal "journalists" and their affiliated media outlets are... but this puts him in the wacko category with the likes of Olbermann, Schultz, Maddow, Shuster, Matthews, Todd, Brewer, etc. in a way that hurts our Country... and this needs to be stopped before the liberally biased media that forwards the Democrat agenda at the expense of truth & to the detriment of America succeeds in stealing another election cycle - and before they succeed in damaging our Country further!!!

A sudden & tragic loss that will take a very long time to get over...

I can't believe that I am actually watching Tom Brokaw report on MSNBC that Tim Russert has passed away today!!!

I have many issues with the way the network has been taken over by people overly biased in favor of the liberal Democrat agenda... but Russert was a one man army holding the line of journalistic integrity...

You will be missed Tim - and the NBC/Universal media outlets will suffer the loss of its one true journalist.

Without Russert to keep hacks like Olbermann, Matthews, Shuster, & Abrams from completely destroying the reputation of NBC News it will be a very sad time over there.

It's gut-check time for Steve Capus... will he stand by his claim to integrity as when he fired Imus from MSNBC... or will he let the biased thugs continue to remove any trace of neutral (let alone conservative) reporting from the MSNBC airwaves - as seen by the way Olbermann was allowed to get Tucker booted from his show.

Goodbye Tim... God Bless!!

MSNBC & their usual "selective bias" in reporting the "facts"

Today Contessa Brewer had someone on commentating about strategy for the November election that made an interesting comment that caught my attention.

I wasn't watching the tv at the moment, I was facing my laptop when the commentator made his comment... but since I am only about 5 feet from my tv I heard him clearly. I wish I had been paying closer attention to the tv because I would really like to know who he was & what his affiliations are - so that I can possibly put his commentary into perspective and explain to myself why someone would do what he did.

Usually commentators are introduced as to being a republican strategist, democrat strategist, or affiliated with a particular party or candidate... but I have no clue who this guy was (I think his name was "Frank" something or other, but I'm not sure) offering his opinions to Contessa - so I won't say for certain what I think his affiliation is... but based on what he said I can sure guess, and I'll bet I am right.

Anyway... on to what got me posting here today.

When discussing how both Senators Obama & McCain will be trying to get votes in states not usually expected to go for their party this man expressed that he doesn't see either candidate being able to pull off a "50 state" campaign - and then gave his reasons why neither Obama nor McCain will change the way certain states vote, regardless of what they do before election day.

I don't have exact quotes from him for his examples, but it was the usual stuff pundits always say - like how New York & California will go Democrat no matter what, and how places like Utah, Texas, etc will go Republican... but that isn't my point.


I did hear how this commentator described the 1984 election, and how he selectively forgot how many states Ronald Reagan actually won that year.

He said something about Reagan "winning many of the states", but not all of them - and used this to prove that even in that lopsided win a candidate couldn't pull off an actual "50 state" campain strategy successfully.

Problem is that Reagan didn't just get "most" of the states that election... he won 49 of them, while Mondale ONLY managed to win ONE state (Minnesota, his home state) and D.C. Reagan won 525 electoral votes to Mondale's 13.

That's effectively pulling off the 50 state strategy because Mondale only won Minnesota by 3800 votes.

But before Reagan successfully pulled off a campaign strategy that Contessa's guest said can't be done it was successfully done my Nixon when he defeated McGovern by winning 49 states to McGovern's 1 (a close Massachusetts & D.C.) in his 520 - 17 electorial vote tally. (1 went to another candidate besides Nixon or McGovern)


My point is that I believe that Obama could pull off victories in states people think he can't win, and that he'll retain states that people like Hillary claim he can't win since he didn't get them in the primary votes.

I also feel that votes can be lost to McCain if Obama picks someone divisive or from the "old-school" of politics (Like Hillary or Ed Rendell) that he campaigned against in his message of "change we can believe in".

I just don't like how Contessa's guest selectively recalled elections of the past (probably out of political bias) in a way that proves the point he is making, even though the actual facts of the event he used as proof doesn't support his conclusion - because this is misleading to the viewers, if not outright false statements to forward an agenda.

What that guest did is just like how Hillary routinely misrepresented things to forward her agenda as she got away with tricking people to vote for her. (like how she got votes in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, & West Virginia based on how she "fights for working people to keep their jobs while the truth is that she helped her husband force NAFTA upon us and that caused many thousands, if not millions, to be unemployed & struggling to get by on next to nothing... this also applies to her health care plan when those newly unemployed lost their coverage)

It's time for people to be held to a higher standard, the truth should not be allowed to be subjective. Hillary & her kind have the right to their opinions, but not their own set of facts. People like Obama are here to hold them accountable to the truth of their crooked politics that got us all in the mess we are in today as a country.

When will someone speak up against the atrocity?

Who were those two guys on Tucker's show tonight? (Wed April 4, 2007)
I haven't heard such BLATANT biased commentary on a "so-called" news network, ever!
Even by the usual radically-left leanings of MSNBC this was incredible! From all of the vemon these two commentators spewed at the President I wouldn't be surprised if Keith Olbermann gave them their talking points.
Those two were VERY unprofessional, obnoxious, and flat out rude as they cut off Tucker or talked over him as he spoke (as Tucker always does) with common-sense, neutral observations of what is factually going on with the situations being debated.
Joe is mild for being the LONE conservative voice among the crashing thunder that is MSNBC's liberal propaganda rants. He's reasonable, unlike his counterpart on the other blatantly biased "news" network. (of course, I refer to Alan Colmes on Fox NEWS Network)
Tucker is a true Independant who will actually report truthful accounts of who is to blame for whatever is being called "news" at MSNBC these days. He doesn't spin things to benefit the Dems or to slam the Republicans - like everyone else there (but Joe, of course) does & tries to claim they aren't as bad as those evil Fox conservatives.
Even those angry liberal blowhards - Bill Mahar & Al Franken don't get as bad as those two guys did on Tucker's show! I don't think that those a-holes Robert Novak & Rush Limbaugh have ever gone on air and spoke as rudely & stupidly as those two did tonight!!
Their information (they called them "facts" & the "truth") had the absolute inaccuracy of Rosie O'Donnell's recent comment that "fire has NEVER melted steel EVER in the history of time". (had Rosie taken 5 minutes to "Google" the topic she would have seen how steel gets melted by fire & heat all the time to form the metal into whatever it is needed to build things... But she - like the MSNBC propagandists - chose to make an obviously false statement rather than admit her point of belief is wrong!!)
A wise man once said "It's better to keep your mouth shut, and be thought a fool... than to open it up, and remove all doubt." Sadly, the MSNBC drones working for the liberal left puppet-masters don't follow this wise advice.
When is Dan Abrams going to admit that the ship he's running at MSNBC isn't objective, neutral, unbiased, or even remotely what could be called "news reporting"? Why doesn't his boss, Phil Griffin, force him to admit the truth?
The answer is simple.
It's popular to bash the Republicans & the Administration. The country was duped into believing the MSNBC propaganda... and the fraud that MSNBC perpetrated upon America was the reason the election went the way it did - and it's why MSNBC has made our country weaker by breading cowards who mindlessly believe the liberal agenda that MSNBC is willingly pushing down America's throats.
MSNBC parades liberal commentator after liberal commentator to repeat their lies & propaganda - because when they spend hour after hour repeating the lie... the people too stupid or too lazy to think for themselves eventually believe the lie to be the truth.
The Democrat Party depends on Americans being too dumb or gullible to realize that Soylent Green is PEOPLE - because without the sheep willing to follow blindly they can't keep their positions of power in D.C.
That's why the Dems are for programs like Social Security, Welfare, Affirmative Action, raising Minimum Wage, quotas, etc...
These are the tools the Dems use to keep many people too poor to survive without them in power. They use scare tactics to get their votes, while raping the very soul of the people they claim to represent.
The country didn't loudly vote against the War - as the Dems & MSNBC want us to believe.
If that's so... then why did Joe Lieberman (the most pro-war Dem around) get re-elected as an Independant?
Recently Keith Olbermann tried to force Bill Mahar to agree with his assertation that the Bush Administration was responsible for the death of Pat Tillman.
Bill Mahar (a man who is so radically liberal that he called the 9/11 terrorists "brave" and the Administration "cowards") couldn't hold his nose to swallow that crap!
Bill Mahar repeatedly told Keith that you couldn't make that leap... no matter how many times Keith kept trying to find a new way to say it & get Bill Mahar tricked into agreeing with him.
Keith ended his segment with Mahar by praising him & his HBO show...
And didn't even take a breath as he moved on to the next story - an interview with Pat Tillman's mother - an interview where Keith held tight to his ridiculous claim of minutes ago (the very same thoery that the much praised Bill Mahar had completely ripped apart) even in the face of reason - reason coming from the wacko Mahar.
It's the same behavior that caused Olbermann to deny that his "buddy" Bill Clinton was to blame for any aspect of 9/11, Al-Qaeda, & Osama... even those the facts are obvious & stated as such by no less than the 9/11 Commission!!!
But Keith knows better than them!!! He has the blind faith in his inquisition as those of the Spanish Inquisition or the Salem Witch Trials did before him.
It's time for MSNBC, Dan Abrams, & all those who would actually wish to be journalists to speak out against the liberal bias plainly in view.
If this isn't stopped from happening in the future it's as culpable as those "moderate" Islamic believers who remain silent as the radical terrorists commit atrocities... or as bad as the silent Germans who let Hitler rise to power rather than admit the truth - even if it means having to admit your side is wrong.
MSNBC's liberal bias weakens our country. Someone needs to speak up & say that increased ratings isn't worth making our country too blind to see the danger that is being created by such behavior & irresponsible "reporting" of propaganda as fact. This is far worse than what the Bush Administration has done by waging war in Iraq & creating terrorists who might later attack our shores.
MSNBC & liberals want us to believe that Republicans are "wolves in sheep's clothing" (and that may even be true) - as if that's the worst thing that could happen.
A wolf in sheep's clothing isn't what we need to be afraid of... because there's something worse than that.
MSNBC & liberals (Democrats) are the thing that is worse.
What is that, you ask? I'll tell you.
The reason you need not be afraid of a wolf in sheep's clothing (Republicans) is because the disguise is always so obvious that the sheep can tell the wolf trying to fool the sheep into believing the wolf is really a sheep.
What needs to be feared is the wolf that presents himself as a FRIENDLY wolf. Nothing to fear, he says, I'm friendly... I'm on your side.
And when the sheep drop their guard... the "friendly" wolf (Dems & MSNBC) devours the sheep who fell for the scam.
Dan Abrams, MSNBC, & especially Keith Olbermann & Chris Matthews should be ashamed of themselves for betraying the trust of the people they claim to be looking out for!!!
I wonder how they can sleep at night, or live with themselves knowing they are the friendly wolf about to devour the fooled sheep!!!
When will it end? Hopefully it will happen before it's too late - MSNBC & the liberals (Democrats) will have the blood on their hands when the eventual result of their ratings hungry propaganda agenda attack against America becomes the next 9/11!!!