Wednesday, September 27, 2006

How "certain" can Hillary really be? (And why are the Democrats so stupidly blind in the acceptance of what they are told is the "truth"?)

How can Hillary be "certain" about anything when it comes to her husband, the Former President, Bill Clinton?

Wasn't she so "certain" that her husband wasn't cheating on her... only to find out that she had NO CLUE what her husband was up to - because he had been having affairs with MUTIPLE women over MANY years!

EVEN AFTER the Gennifer Flowers incident when she stood by his side, claiming she was "certain" that he wouldn't do that ever again... and the former President DID do it again!! Not only did Hillary's husband have another affair... he did it RIGHT UNDER HER NOSE with an intern at the White House!!!


SO...

How can Hillary have the audacity to get up in front of America and it's citizens proclaiming loudly & boldly that she is so "certain" about something she obviously isn't qualified one tiny bit to comment on.



OH...

If Senator Clinton says that if her husband & his staff had a memo clearly stating that Osama Bin Laden wanted to attack America and Americans - that they would have done something about it...

Why didn't they do something to stop him when he boldly was interviewed by John Miller of ABC News in 1998?

Osama clearly announced that he was extending his fatwa against the "West" to include the United States - and this would mean attacks on US soil, because Osama wanted to KILL Americans!!!

That is as clear an indicator as the memo received by the Bush Administration in August of 2001...



In 1998, President Clinton announced, “We will use all the means at our disposal to bring those responsible to justice, no matter what or how long it takes.”

So the mutiple times that the CIA had Osama on camera of an unmaned drone, that was him using every means at his disposal?

I think that video that remained hidden until years later is clear proof that former President Clinton DID NOT even attempt to honor that pledge he made to the American people.


And since we have proof that the President and his staff FAILED to follow through with that promise OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN ... doesn't that make Senator Clinton's recent comments to be A TOTAL BUNCH OF CRAP???


If it's not crap, the only other thing it could be is a PACK OF LIES!!! (which is exactly what the Clinton's have given the American public from the very beginning of their political lives)


And that's a pretty pathetic excuse that the former President WANTED TO either capture or kill Osama when those chances presented themselves... but he wasn't allowed because the CIA and the FBI just wouldn't let him!!!

WAIT... Isn't another term for the President of the United States of America - the COMMANDER IN CHIEF ???

What that means is this: Bill Clinton was the one who made the final decision... NOT the CIA or the FBI!!!

They are there to offer their advice, but the President could disregard that advice and if he gave the order to proceed - they would have to obey, or risk TREASON!!!


If former President Clinton wasn't strong enough so that even if his decision went contrary to the advice of his CIA Director & his National Security Advisor... then he never deserved to be the Commander in Chief in the first place!!

Oh wait, he was much more interested in being the FORNICATOR in Chief while he was trading away our Nuclear secrets to the Chinese who were giving donations and being allowed to sleep in the Lincoln Bedroom.

Maybe if Billy-boy didn't spend so much time either sticking a cigar up Monica's butt or getting a hummer from her, being a traitor for giving our nuclear secrets to the Chinese who bought his (and th Democratic Party's) loyalty, being an accomplice in the cover up of Vince Foster's murder (who was involved in the cover up of the Whitewater scandal) and playing golf with Vernon Jordan & talking about "pussy"... MAYBE, JUST MAYBE he could have gathered up some BALLS to tell the people under him what to do???

I mean, he did tell the American people that he would do whatever it took, for how ever long it took, to get Osama.

Just another of the many million lies or unfulfilled promises of "Slick Willy" Clinton.




I WILL ADDRESS SOME THINGS THAT THE DEMOCRAT "SHEEP" REFUSE TO ADMIT:



FIRST, The 9-11 Commission DID say that there were failures by the Clinton Administration that lead to the tragedy of September 11th, 2001.


I know, all you blind sheep of the Democrat faithful don't want to hear that, let alone believe it... but it's a fact that if you OBJECTIVELY read the report you will clearly see that to be true. (I'll throw you a bone and say that they also say that the Bush II Administration made their share of mistakes as well... but the Democrat pundits, politicians, the Media, and regular crackpots will try anything to get people to not hear them admit that fact.)

One of the tools used by these Biased, Liberal "reporters" (that they picked up from the partisan, biased, Liberal politicians) is the one where they keep saying their point of view as if it were the truth - no matter how wrong or implausable it really is - in the hope that everyone else will BELIEVE them, and then they make what they want come true.

See, this almost always works on the public who vote Democrat. These people can't think for themselves, and NEED to be told what to do.

Chris Matthews & his fellow MSNBC staff reporters are notorious for this tactic. The seem like the Stepford Wives the way they read the script prepared for the network by the writing staff over at the Democratic National Committee.

Haven't you realized that this is why they have so many "bubble-headed"bimbos (oops, I mean lovely ladies) dominating as the "on-air personalities"? (There is almost NOBODY over at MSNBC that can be called an actual "reporter" or "journalist") I swear that if someone like Amy Robach, Contessa Brewer, or Rita Cosby had an original thought, their heads would explode.

There are only 3 "personalities" on MSNBC that seem to have intelligence, talent, and a sense of humor. One is Norah O'Donnell, who only gets limited time on screen because she is an actual reporter... so she gets relegated to reporting fron the location of a story. Next is Alison Stewart, who has finally found a nice timeslot as the anchor of her own show - "The Most". (For those of you with a brain... this is actually an afternoon version of "Countdown" - ONLY, it's not as retarded as Olbermann's show because Alison is much funnier, more intelligent, and not at all biased like Keith is. Basically, "Countdown with Keith Olbermann" has become the 'poorman's' version of "The Most with Alison Stewart"... poor Keith, he has become irrelevant as will as impotent.) The only other woman that MSNBC has that is worth watching unfortunately gets treated like a red-headed stepchild. It could be because she is beautiful, funny, intelligent, and absolutely qualified... BUT the real reason that Monica Crowley keeps losing her anchor positions is because she's a CONSERVATIVE REPUBLICAN (the "token" conservative) and that just isn't tolerated in MSNBC's Liberal-land!

BUT... the MSNBC airwaves aren't only wasted on those ladies who dominate the morning hours after Imus is over. There are 3 men who clog the airwaves like eating 4 Double Quarter Pounders with extra cheese every day would do to your arteries.

Ron Reagan used to share a show with Monica Crowley. But because he can only accept/understand the Liberal-Democratic position on any subject, rather than have a free-thinking mind that can accept the opposing view if it ends up being correct (like Monica could) was most likely the reason the show was pulled from the lineup. It's so sad to see him tarnish his father's legacy by being such a tool of the Democratic party.

Chris Mathews likes to think he is the most respected reporter on TV... but that ttile goes to Tim Russert of NBC's "Meet the Press". Chris tries so hard to hide his obvious lean to the Left, but the only person he fools is himself. He has become a caricature of himslef... to the point where SNL cast member Darrell Hammond's portrayal of Matthews is totally indistinguishable from the real thing. It's almost like watching Arnold Schwarzenegger's movie "The 6th Day" when it;s time to figure out which is the real Arnold... and which is the clone.

Matthews is trying SO HARD to have the Democrats take control in the Fall elections that it looks like he's about to burst a blood vessel. He has been obsessed with what he feels is absolute proof of Virginia Senatorial Candidate, George Allen is a racist - that he ignores abything that doesn't support his fanatical beliefs. He kept quoting the Salon.com's report as "proof" of Allen's guilt. The article was based on asking 19 people if Allen ever used the "N" word - 16 said "no" George Allen did NOT use that word, 2 didn't comment... and ONLY 1 said that Allen did say that word - OVER 30 YEARS AGO!!! Matthews chooses to believe the 1 person & not the 16. Even after a second "source" said on TV that he didn't ever HEAR George Allen use the word... Chris Matthews chose to believe the guy when he told Chris that he DID hear Allen say that word... and ignore the guy when he admitted that what he told Matthews the previous day couldn't be true. Like my father used to say, "Never let a thing liek the truth get in the way of what you believe"

Chris Matthews makes sure he brings up his version of the "facts" to every guest on his show... and then he TELLS them how he is certain that this is the end of not only Allen's Senatorial run... but that it also has destroyed any chance of Allen to even consider running for President in 2008 - just so that his guests can agree with him. And if they don't... he just restates his position over & over until either his guest agrees, or his segment is over & he leaves.

I guess Matthews figures that if he keeps this up with his belief that the Democrats wil take back total control of Congress enough times... that the mindless drones who vote Democrat will finally get the message & do what Matthews wants.

This process is repeated by about 90% of the MSNBC (and NBC) personalities.

Hopefully, America is smart enough not to fall for that.

And the third... is Olbermann. This guy is just as much of an asshole as Bill mahar & Al Franken... that I don't even want to waste ony more time, effort, or energy on those three douchebags. I'm sure you can get the hint from what I have already posted.

BUT... I will say this:

Not only is Olbermann the exact type of "tool" that Clinton claimed the FOX News reporter of being... he is obviously in LOVE with Clinton... to the point where I believe that Olbermann is Clinton's new "Monica".

Earlier this week, the former President appeared on "Countdown". The promo commercials for this episode was so over the top cheesy... you would swear that Keith was 100 times the reporter that Cronkite ever was!!! The promo spot (voiced over by Keith's trusty & loyal assistant) actually called it "The Olbermann Interview" - as if it would be a monumental moment of human history. What a load of crap!!!

Keith can barely get through a segment without making some juvenile reference/comment/joke in the line of a "pull my finger" gag. BUT... this man ws going to interview the most "provocative" personality of the 21st century!!! (a title given to Clinton by Olbermann's voice guy, and not by any reoutable source)

Keith was tossing Clinton so many softballs... I swear they were going to shower together afterward. (probably... because that way Keith could blow Clinton again like he did with that "blow job piece" of an ibnterview.)



It totally amazes me how every single Democrat will defend whatever mistake, lie, or blunder that the Democrat Party is stuck with at any given moment.

Recently we saw that loud-mouthed, rude, retarded, vulgar, idiot - Al Franken - try to use his normal tactic of getting loud, interrupting, & trying to bully the opposition into giving up so that Al can claim victory. You can see Al on "Hardball" on MSNBC frequently because Chris Matthews is notorious and very blatant at showing that Matthews is a Liberal Democrat who never misses a chance to slam the Republicans & conservatives.

(For the record... I'm not a Republican... I am a Libertarian - so this isn't me just slamming the Democrats. I have the double pleasure of being able to look at both parties & see what they are doing wrong when I complain of one party, or both, being wrong.)


Al Franken is just like Bill Mahar & Jon Stewart. Three comedians who think they are qualified to be either a reporter, pundit, or advocate for the Democrat party on any topic. The three of them should have stuck with comedy, but they aren't even very good at that - so they needed a "hook" to help separate them from the masses of other losers out there bashing the President just for the sake of bashing him.

These three are really worse than the "tool" reporters pretending to be objective (Can anyone say, Dan rather?) because these three half-assed comedians are merely critics in disguise. And a critic is the lowest form of scum in the media industry. They are like a chihuahua dog, always yapping, but not making any sense - while they annoy you to the point you want to choke them.

See, critics like Franken, Mahar, & Stewart never actually DO anything - they just COMPLAIN about whatever the President & his staff are doing.

It was pathetic watching Bill Mahar make the rounds of various tv shows, because he basically had only one line to spit out - and he didn't even get that one sound byte out in a way that didn't make him sound (and lok) like he was either drunk, high, or both.

I saw Bill on 3 programs... and every time his line of "If the President has to keep telling you over & over that you're in a war, then you're NOT in a war. So just shut up already!"

Notice, that Mahar uses the Franken technique of insults? That's because he doesn't have enough intelligence to form a real argument. It's that lack of intelligence that makes it easier for them to swallow the Democratic Party line & actually believe they are in a majority, when they are out in left field with a couple other freaks.



Another "tool" news person is Keith Olbermann. I find it funny that former President Clinton called Mr. Wallace of FOX News as doing the bidding of his bosses by asking the question that mad Clinton look like the Village Idiot suffering from rabies... when it's Olbermann & Matthews who are clearly deep in the pocket of the Democratic Party.

That moron Olbermann ends his program (I'm not sure what to call it. It's supposed to be a news program... but in the commercials promoting the show they compare "Countdown" with "The Daily Show with Jon Stewart" on Comedy Central. How can you respect a news show that is aspiring to be like a comedy program mocking the news? The answer to that rhetorical question obviously is... you CAN'T!!) every night with a reverse of a "countdown" by telling his listeners how many days it has been since President Bush declared "Mission Accomplished".

Hey Keith... I know you're not too bright, so I'll try to explain this in words even you can understand:

The MISSION being talkled about in that speech was to remove Saddam Hussein from being the brutal, mass-murderous dictator of Iraq... and they ACCOMPLISHED that goal, so that's why they can say MISSION ACCOMPLISHED - now do you understand?

It's obvious moments of bias that should disqualify Olbermann from being on a National News Channel as Anchor of an "alleged" news program.

News is supposed to be just the facts - without your opinion tilting it to one side or the other. You can't be objective ever, so you have no place on that program.


Here's another problem with critics... they tell you your way is wrong... but they don't have a plan that is better than the one in place.

Howard Dean was a prime offender of this common Democrat flaw. When he was "allowed" to go on tv and spout his inane ramblings, he never once gave an alternative plan that would let people know that maybe we SHOULD vote for his party.

He would mention IDEAS... but never once did he offer a plan that would accomplish those ideas.

Hey, I like the sound of lowering the defecit, getting health care for every American, and most of the other things Dean claimed his party could produce - who wouldn't want those things?

But when asked how his party would accomplish those ideas... dean would stutter, repeat himself, and then end up sounding like an idiot because he realized that the people would HAVE to know that he didn't have a clue about what needs to be done. So, the only thing Dean could do, would be to take the focus away from that knowledge by doing the only thing he knows - getting loud, rambling like a fool, and attacking the Republican Party.


BUT I HAVE STRAYED FROM THE MIAN TOPIC FOR DISCUSSION... SO BACK TO HOW THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION IS TO BLAME FOR 9-11:


Unlike the Democrats... I am going to provide source material to back up what i am going to point out to you. This way you can't accuse me of lying, selecting certians "facts" and then spinning it to prove my point, or any of the other things Democrats do...


Here is the link to an MSNBC website from March 17th, 2004 dealing with the 9-11 Commission saying that the Clinton Administration did in fact, miss opportunities & make other mistakes that kept them from catching/killing Osama Bin Laden.

As I have stated above: The Commission DID place blame on the Clinton Administration - CONTRARY to what former President Clinton, Senator Clinton, and every other Democrat chooses to say.

It's exactly like how they look at the recent Intelligence report & can say that we are less safe now than before September 11th, 2001 - DESPITE THE FACT THAT THERE HASN'T BEEN ONE SINGLE TERRORIST ATTACK ON U.S. SOIL SINCE 9/11/01.

Here is the link to MSNBC's report from 2 years ago that deals with this very subject:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4540958/
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3907198/

Now, I will take some excerpts from that report to help the thick-headed Democrats who just don't understand what Clinton & his staff did wrong:

The Clinton people argued with ABC over what they called errors in the script for the program dealing with the events leading up to 9/11/01. Here is one point of contention that the Clintion people got right... well, SORT OF. (I'll explain after I detail what what being argued about)

The docudrama was going to show Army troops & CIA personnel chasing down Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan. Supposedly, they were so close that they COULD have killed Osama - BUT just before they could have completed the mission, the Clinton administration pulled the plug... allowing Osama to get away & be free to plan the 9-11 attacks.


Here's the problem with that whole thing:

Even though the Clinton Administration DID have a plan to either capture or kill Osama... the plan didn't get close to being accomplished - BECAUSE THERE NEVER WERE EITHE ARMY TROOPS OR CIA PERSONNEL IN AFGHANISTAN AT THE TIME IN QUESTION.

There were supposedly two occasions where it was discussed... but both times Clinton allowed Gen. Hugh Shelton, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and CIA Director George Tenet to make the decision for him to NOT follow through with the plan. (depending on who you talk to, it was either because they couldn't offer 100% proof that osama was to blame for the things he was being chased for... or that to follow through with the plan would also kill people considered to be "innocent" - so they couldn't go through with the plan.)

Either way, this proves that Clinton didn't deserve to be President in the first place. Supposedly Clinton was the "Commander in Chief" - yet he allowed two subordinates to bully him around and make a decision for him that eventually caused the tragedy of 9/11/01 to happen.

I'll say that again folks, so that it can sink in:

THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION LET TWO CHANCES TO KILL OSAMA BIN LADEN - AND HE ALLOWED PEOPLE TO TALK HIM OUT OF IT!!

Now, that may seem like I contradicted myself, but I didn't. How could they have been close enough to kill Osama... without having either CIA personnel or Army Troops in Afghanistan - the country where Osama was hiding at the time?


Well, it wasn't known until later on, when video from an unmaned drone was released (BUT YEARS AFTER CLINTON LEFT OFFICE) in the year 2004. The video showed a man everyone agreed MUST be Osama because that man was so much taller than everyone else, he was being shown the respect of a person in charge, and it was at the very location in Tora Bora where it was KNOWN that Osama was staying - but for some reason... that wasn't enough for Shelton & Tenet, and they got the President to not give the "ok" for the operatioin to go forward - which would have spared everyone the tragedy on 9/11/01 that killed thousands... but effected us all.



REMEMBER: President Clinton told us that he would do whatever it took, for however long it took... until they accomplished the goal. Doesn't sound like Bill Clinton can be counted on to tell the truth, or to keep his word... BUT WE ALREADY KNEW THAT ABOUT HIM, DIDN'T WE??



Here is some infor from the news article that explains why the Clinton Administration was NEVER going to capture/kill Osama Bin Laden:


A Democratic member of the 9/11 commission (Bob Kerry) says there was a larger issue:

The Clinton administration treated bin Laden as a law enforcement problem.

Gary Schroen, a former CIA station chief in Pakistan, says:

The White House required the CIA to attempt to capture bin Laden alive, rather than kill him.
What impact did the wording of the orders have on the CIA’s ability to get bin Laden?

“It reduced the odds from, say, a 50 percent chance down to, say, 25 percent chance that we were going to be able to get him,” said Schroen.
Bob Kerry, a former senator and current 9/11 commission member, said:

“The most important thing the Clinton administration could have done would have been for the president, either himself or by going to Congress, asking for a congressional declaration to declare war on al-Qaida, a military-political organization that had declared war on us.”


One Clinton Cabinet official said:

Looking back, the military should have been more involved, “We did a lot, but we did not see the gathering storm that was out there.”


SO... WE HAVE A DEMOCRAT ON THE 9/11 COMMISSION DETAILING HOW THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION HELPED CAUSE 9/11/01... AND A CLINTON OFFICAL ADMITIING THAT THEY HAD NO CLUE WHAT TO EXPECT... & SHOULD HAVE DONE MORE WHEN THEY COULD HAVE!!!

IMAGINE THAT!!!



NOW, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO THINK THE "CLINTON YEARS" WERE FULL OF THEM BEING TOUGH ON TERRORISTS & BEING "THE MOST AGGRESSIVE ADMINISTRATION BEFORE OR SINCE 9/11/01 ON TERRORISM"...

HERE'S SOME THINGS FOR YOU TO THINK ABOUT:


Somalia: 1993 - When Clinton decided to leave Somalia, Osama Bin Laden came to believe that the U.S. would not last in a battle that was drawn out over a long period of time and was very messy in casualties.

Waco, Tx: 1993 - President Clinton orders government agencies to go after a religious sect that is deemed to be dangerous. After a 51 day stand-off, it is believed (according to the Clinton Administration) that the Branch Davidians set the fires that caused the deaths of approximately 80 people and their leader, David Koresh.

World Trade Center Bombing #1: 1993 - Bombing that caused the death of 6 people and injuring over 1000. It took the Clinton Administration until 1997 or 1998 to "realize" (you'll see why I use this word rather than giving them credit for obtaining the knowledge of who perpretrated the bombing) that Osama Bin Laden's terrorist group Al Qaeda was behind the bombing.

Oklahoma City Bombing: 1995 - To commemorate the 2nd anniversary of the disaster at Waco, Tx - former Desert Storm Army Gold Star winner turned anarchist/terrorist - detonated a bomb that killed 168 people and injured about 600 more. THANKFULLY for the Clinton Administration, McVeigh allowed himself to be caught (thinking he would be sen as a radical & revolutionary... but when he realized that a daycare was part of the building he bombed, he knew he would be seen as a monster - which is how history describes him) - or most likely his military training would have prevented the Clinton Administration from solving the crime.

Atlanta Olympics Bombing: 1996 - Eric Rudolph, homegrown terrorist/serial bomber, detonated a home-made bomb durring the 1996 Olympic Games in Atlanta... killing 2 people & injuring over 100 people. He managed to hide out in a forrested area until 2003 when one of the local residents finally decided to provide government officials with information that allowed them to capture Rudolph.

"Unabomber" bombing spree: 1993 - Ted Kaczynski, college professor turned terrorist/serial bomber went on a spree (starting in 1979 and lasting intermittedly until 1998) that killed 3 people and injured 23 more people - according to his plea agreement.

U.S. Foreign Embassy Bombings: 1998 - A precision-timed bombing of two US Embassies of separate East African countries kills 257 people and injures over 4000 people between the two locations. A local branch of Al Qaeda takes credit for the bombings. After some scrambling for information on the terrorist group, the Clinton Administration has the organization's leader, Osama Bin Laden, declared as "Public Enemy #1".

ABC Interview with Osama: 1998 - John Miller of ABC News interviews Osama Bin Laden in Southern Afghanistan. In the interview, Osama declares to the American public (and to the Clinton Administration who declared him "Public Enemy #1") that he is changing the fatwa he declared two years earlier. Previously he called for all Muslims to attack/kill any American military personnel that is part of the "occupying force of the Holy Lands" (a reference to US Troops being stationed in his homeland of Saudia Arabia as part of joint relations between the two countries) - but now he calls on all Muslims to rise up and attack/kill Americans (civilian and military) whereever they may be found. He has informed the Clinton Administration on National TV that he is declaring a Holy War that will include US soil, if given the chance... AGAIN. It is because of this interview (and NOT because of any hard work or investigation done by the Clinton Administration) that the world knows who was behind the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center and the twin bombs in the US Embassies in Eastern Africa. After this interview, it cannot be claimed that an attack from Al Qaeda is unexpected, even on US soil.

USS Cole Bombing: 2000 - Osama Bin Laden's terrorist group, Al Qaeda attack the USS Cole as it is in the Aden Harbor, Yemen. The number of Navy personnel that are either confirmed or presumed dead is 17, and 40 were injured. Eventually, 2 men were executed & another four were given prison sentences ranging from 5 to 10 years. The bombing of the USS Cole was preceded earlier that year by a failed attempt to bomb the USS The Sullivans.





ALL OF THOSE ACTS OF TERRORISM UNDER THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION... YET THE CLINTON CAMP, AND THEIR DEMOCRAT AUTOMOTON SLAVE FOLLOWERS STILL CLAIM THAT THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION IS "THE MOST AGGRESSIVE ADMINISTRATION" WHEN TRYING TO COMBAT TERRORISM.


SURE, WE BELIEVE YOU "SLICK WILLY"... JUST LIKE WE BELIEVED YOU WHEN YOU TOLD US YOU NEVER INHALED, OR THAT YOU WOULDN'T CHEAT ON YOUR WIFE AGAIN & BECAUSE OF THAT NEW CONVICTION YOU DESERVED TO BE OUR PRESIDENT... AND OH YEAH, WHEN YOU SAID YOU DIDN'T HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH MONICA....

WE BELIEVE YOU, MR CLINTON. WHY NOT... IF YOUR WIFE IS SO CERTAIN, AND YOU HAVE SUCH A SOLID RECORD OF BEING TRUTHFUL... WE'LL BELIEVE YOU NOW.




Sure, that totally beats out how President Bush ousted Sadam from being a mass-murderous, terrorist-sponsoring, egomanical dictator... killing his two sons who were just as bad as he was... capturing or killing all the major players of Saddam's evil Regeime... forcing the Taliban from power... either capturing or killing the majority of the leaders of Osama's Al Qaeda group... isolating Osama to an extreme remote area to the point that he is effectivelycut off from the rest of Al Qaeda so as to nullify his influence/existence... killed his #1 in Iraq... captured Khalid Shiek Muhhamed & are getting very valuable information on Al Qaeda in general, their methods, their hiding locations, their money sources, their members, their plans...

I know there is one more... but I am having trouble remembering what it is.


OH YEAH, I REMEMBER NOW...


UNDER THIS CURRENT ADMINISTRATION (THE ONE YOU CRITICIZE SO MUCH AND CLAIM TO HAVE DONE A BETTER JOB THAN) THERE HAS NOT BEEN ANOTHER ATTACK ON AMERICAN SOIL, AND NO MAJOR ATTACKS ON AMERICAN ANYWHERE ON THE PLANET!!!!!



BUT... Senator Clinton is "certain" that her husband has done more, and would still do more... than this current Administration that has been keeping every American citizen safe from another attack (that her husband caused by his inaction, & blundering action)



Maybe if "Slick Willy" hadn't spent so mcuh time having affairs with all those women (while Senator Clinton was "certain" that he could be trusted not to do that again, or to lie to her about it again) he could have had time to do SOMETHING to capture/kill Osama???

I guess he would rather stick a cigar up Monica's butt... get a hummer from her... or go play some golf with Vernon Jordan while talking about "pussy" than do what he told the American people he would do so that Osama & Al Qaeda would get the punishment they deserve.


Maybe he was TOLD by his Chinese superiors to just leave Osama alone? You know... the Chinese people who donated HUGE sums of cash to the DNC by way of Clinton and then were allowed to do things like 1) Have a private meeting with the President, 2) Get to fly on Air Force One, or 3) Get to spend a night in the Lincoln bedroom - AND (as a bonus) they received Top-secret information about our Nuclear program so that China could advance their Nuclear technology??? There's nothing like selling out your country to what will be the next Superpower to make you forget about some pesky terrorist and his organization.



Or... maybe it was because he was so busy with Hillary, Vince Foster, & God only knows who else as the destroyed evidence, lied under oath, hid & shredded documents to hide just how much proof there was to show the Clinton's guilt in the Whitewater crime scam - that was perpretrated by the First Couple????





SO... in closing.


Senator Hillary Clinton can't be "certain" about anything that her husband says. Bill Clinton is a habitual liar... and he actually believes his own lies that he tells us.



Either Bill & Hillary are STUPID... or they think think the American public is... there's just no other reason they would get up in public & try to get away with saying things that are so obviously LIES!

Hopefully there are enough people in America who don't just blindly accept the BULLSHIT they get spoon-fed to them by their Democratic con artists who pose as Congressmen, Senators, pundits... and (the sleasiest & dumbest of the bunch) blowhards who pretend to be UNBIASED REPORTERS - otherwise the country will be in for some serious trouble if the Democrats manage to SCAM their way int control of Congress!!